WELL buildings: fad or fortune?

    Work-life balance and mental wellbeing are increasingly being recognised as key to staff motivation and productivity. Many businesses are beginning to incorporate workplace wellness as part of their strategy to deliver a meaningful and engaging employee experience and, in turn, create a higher-performing workforce.

    Evolving working practices

    Rapid technological advances and new generations entering the workforce has driven new ways of working, and businesses have now begun to turn their attentions to the link between their employees’ physical and mental wellbeing and productivity.

    Not only do they have a duty of care to their employees to take all steps which are reasonably possible to ensure their health, safety and wellbeing, workplace wellness is also becoming a source of competitive advantage, both in terms of brand awareness, talent acquisition and staff retention.

    LSH-1,147-Wellbeing-Project-map-2

    Defining wellness

    As a concept, ‘wellness’ is relatively new and there is still considerable ambiguity around the definition, usage and function of the word. At its most basic level, wellness can be defined as a “state of being in good health, especially as an actively pursued goal”. However, it is intangible, difficult to define and even harder to measure. This makes developing and even identifying buildings that promote workplace wellness a challenging task.

    The WELL Building Standard was introduced by the International WELL Building Institute (IWBI) in October 2014 as an evidence-based system for measuring, certifying and monitoring the performance of building features that impact health and wellbeing.

    Focusing on seven categories of air, water, nourishment, light, fitness, comfort and mind, WELL identifies a series of performance metrics, design strategies, and procedures that can be implemented to improve building occupant health and wellbeing.

    The intentions for each of the seven categories are listed below:

    From a practical perspective, this means that businesses are able to assess and compare a building’s wellness quality against measurable criteria, allowing them to make informed decisions about their future property strategy.

    graph

    Risk v reward

    Caroline Waldron, senior surveyor in LSH’s office advisory division, believes the reason so few buildings have achieved certification to date is because of the extensive nature of the requirements and associated costs, rather than a lack of occupier demand. She commented: “Cultivating employee wellbeing within the office environment is becoming increasingly important, not only in terms of the individuals themselves but also the company as a whole. However, there are no fixed costs when it comes to incorporating the required elements to meet the WELL Building Standard, making it a substantial investment.

    “Businesses need to balance the long and short-term objectives of achieving the WELL Building Standard against their often restricted budgets. Recipients of the Standard are also required to continuously demonstrate their compliance by measuring and documenting all of its performance metrics which also makes it quite onerous from an occupier’s perspective. If WELL Buildings are to take-off in the UK, it’s likely that landlords will need to be the driving force behind them.”

    So the question is, from the built environment’s perspective, will landlords see this as a passing fad or will the WELL Building Standard become a primary consideration to all future office developments?

    Landid and Brockton, the developer behind the Porter Building in Slough – the first in the UK to achieve WELL Core and Shell Certification – believes that in five years, every new office building will be seeking a WELL certification.

    Chris Hiatt, director at Landid, commented: “Landid has always been at the forefront of sustainability best practice within the built environment so, when we heard about the WELL Building Standard, it seemed like the next logistical step for us.

    “Yes, we’ve taken on an element of risk but, when you think back to when BREEAM was first introduced, there was a great deal of debate about its value and now it’s common practice across all major developments. From the research we’ve seen from the International WELL Building Institute, the conversations we’ve been having with occupiers and the fund interest we’ve received since launching the building, we’re confident that this will be the same. Therefore, anything we can do to support it, whether by making the WELL Building Standard a core feature of all our future developments, or by simply raising the debate, makes total sense.”

    Caroline Waldron:

    cwaldron@lsh.co.uk

    For a detailed guide on office costs for over 50 UK locations, view our latest Total Office Costs Survey:

    lsh.co.uk/tocs

    Lambert-Smith-H-logo-copy